OpenAI Codex CLI vs OpenCode TUI
Enterprise-grade sandboxing vs open-source multi-provider terminal agility. Feature matrix and evidence comparison.
结论
Codex offers robust sandbox security policies and approval gates, while OpenCode offers maximum model provider flexibility and an open-source terminal TUI.
| Feature | Codex CLI | OpenCode |
|---|---|---|
| License | Proprietary CLI | Open Source (MIT) |
| Architecture | Native Rust / Sandboxed | Node / TS / @ai-sdk |
| Interface | Headless CLI / Inline TUI | Rich Terminal TUI |
| Model Support | OpenAI + Custom Providers | Multi-provider by design |
| MCP Support | Native in config.toml | Custom plugins |
| DeepSeek Status | Verified (50% success rate) | Verified (50% success rate) |
Recommendation
- Use Codex if your workflows require granular file sandboxing, strict security boundaries, or automated CI execution.
- Use OpenCode if you prefer a keyboard-driven TUI, full source-code transparency, and seamless switching across diverse model endpoints.